Building a PC, Part IX: Downsizing

Here’s a Velka build video.

What is going on here?

What is UP with people using SATA drives on these builds? Seriously folks. Come on.

Apparently there’s a Velka 3 as well?

That build looks literally painful, very tight.

Honestly, I’d be interested in even smaller builds. The Nintendo Switch got me thinking of it is viable yet, to build a portable PC-gaming tablet yet.

Two years ago I was considering to build my own PC, but in order to replace my laptop at the time I had the choice between buying another laptop, building TWO PCs for two locations with all the synchronization and software costs that come with it, or a highly portable PC – where the use of public transport meant that anything much larger than a 17" workstation laptop would be unviable. End result was that I got an Acer VX15 laptop after all, since even using external power supplies to cut down on the size, weight and internal heat production of the computing package proved hard.

I wonder if meanwhile parts akin to laptop internals are available for custom builds? Back then, especially getting the thickness down below 4-5cm was near impossible.

That experienced left me quite impressed with the Switch; The gaming performance is great, especially considering that the fan is barely audible under full docked load, even when standing right in front of me. (Fan noise was one of my original motivations for moving away from laptops.)

1 Like

Except if you’re running a database server which benefits more from a higher clock speed rather than just throwing cores at it.
I’d take a Xeon Platinum/Gold over any other CPU for my database workloads.

I use my machines mostly for development and don’t need a powerful GPU, just lots of CPU and RAM, and fast storage. I just bought two HP EliteDesk 800 G5 with an i7-9700K and an i9-9900K. Those are 95W TDP processors in an absolutely tiny 1 liter chassis that’s a marvel of engineering, replacing the already fairly small HP Z200 and Z230 SFF workstations I used previously. The second one (I haven’t received it yet) even has dual M.2 NVMe slots.

Here is Geekbench on the i7-9700K, fastest machine I own:

https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1826503

1 Like

How are the acoustics with that small case? I would happily take a bigger case for a quieter build. I also tend not to put the absolute most powerful parts in partly for noise and partly for cost.

1 Like

Those USFF “Mini” or “Tiny” enterprise designs are pretty amazing; basically a decent laptop, minus the screen, in a smaller but thicker footprint. However, they just don’t have the cooling capacity to run flat-out continually. I have a oldish Lenovo ThinkCentre M92p Mini with an i5-4570T (2 HT cores, 2.9 base, 3.6 turbo), and it’s great for browsing, watching, and even light or retro gaming, but under significant loads (compiling or endcoding or folding@home), it throttles because of temperature quite quickly. And that’s with a 35W CPU! With a full 95W CPU, that fan will be going full blast quite quickly and it’s going to throttle very soon after. Yes, you have more cores, but there is just no way it’s taking advantage of the turbo clocks of those [unlocked] K CPUs for more than a few seconds before being slowed down to keep from overheating. Combined with the fact that it’s pretty rare to find those type of machines with a [non-enterprise] BIOS/UEFI that supports changing the multipliers, seems like putting a K series CPU in it might be kind of a waste.

1 Like

Did some downsizing myself a while ago, maybe the insights are relevant to you folks. :slight_smile:

1 Like

@codinghorror could you include the motherboard you used? I didn’t see a reference to it in the post.

Will you be forthcoming with benchmarks and temp under load as well?

1 Like

It’s not operational yet, but the use-case will be running parallel compiles for hours, so I will be able to report fairly quickly how it compares with the Z230 it replaces.

Was the fact the 3D-printed case not metal and thus not acting as a heat sink a problem?

Not at all. Even in relatively warm environments (well above 20°C) the components don’t appear to get unusually hot. The fans and the AIO are doing a good job moving the heat.

Yes, sort of. There are mobile class CPUs with reduced TDP and mobile class GPU modules. It can be tricky to source these however.

Right but who is actually running a live production database server on their desktop, doing thousands of queries per second? I think this is a bit of a fantasy. The more realistic scenario is compiling code or running unit tests. And even then, guess what we found with Discourse (Ruby)… the fastest boxes are all Intel i9-99xx!

Above is the post spec test, which is considerable at 10+ seconds of runtime.

Here’s my i9-9900ks Geekbench result for what it is worth.

That is the question, it depends how much the fans spin up. Right now I notice the video card (2080 RTX Ti founders edition) most of all – but it is unclear why the video card would suddenly decide to spin up to full 5000rpm?! I’m still looking at that. The 120mm and 140mm fans are fairly quiet; I may put a reducer on the 92mm fan (included with all Noctua fans) to keep it going slow as it tends to have a higher rpm due to its size I suppose:

Now that I look at this, it is interesting that the system fans are barely spinning up under load. :thinking: I guess it takes a while for system temps to raise enough.

Also @mrus your custom build is amazing. You’re right that the 860 QVOs get real weird (160mb/sec or lower) once you fill the internal caches. It’s almost like a fancy solid state tape drive :rofl:

@gortok I find motherboards are kind of interchangeable and not super interesting. I used the Aorus Z390 Pro WiFi on the DA2, and I am planning to use an Asus Z390 for the next DAN build.

1 Like

I’d hope no one is running production loads on their desktop :-).
Perhaps my remark was a bit off-topic but as a DBA, SQL is on my mind ;-).

Anyhow, I did test it myself by comparing workload running on a VM with 8 ‘slow’ cores compared to one with 4 fast(er) cores. The latter was the fastest even though it was 3 generations older. We’re talking about 2.5 vs 3.2 ghz here.

1 Like

I just doubt you’d get that kind of workload on a desktop, personally. Plus these desktop cores are 5.0 Ghz.

Note how close that is :wink:

I went ahead and installed the Noctua fan reducer on the 92mm fan since it’s the smallest one in the system and thus most likely to spin fast and noisy.

Minimum speed went from 779 rpm to 556 rpm.

This thing is kinda fun Motif Monument – Yuel Beast Designs

I build for quietness now. The only fan in my system is directly over the CPU – fanless power supply, fanless GPU, etc. I miss when computers weren’t noise polluters, and now we can have that again.

1 Like

Yes, this is very easy in today’s world, efficiency is fantastic! It used to be far harder, see: Building a Quiet PC

I ended up getting a 3 fan 2080 Ti to help, the Founders Edition is a dual fan and seems to lock in at minimum 1500 RPM for no reason :exclamation: The 3 fan model indeed works better in an open air environment, defaults to under 1000 RPM at idle, and fits well in this case particuarly with the bottom dust mesh removed.

So yeah, my recommendation is to get a 3 fan style card here, and avoid blower rear exhaust cards in these kinds of builds.

what makes you NOT considering a water cooling system :bowing_man:‍♂

1 Like