AsusUpdate for Win64 bricks your motherboard in a very nice fashion
Yep, I read it has to do with updating the latest BIOS over a very old BIOS. Still unforgivable, since ASUS bricked my ASUS motherboard. I’ve grown a little gun shy of Windows BIOS updaters as a result, so I’ll be updating my BIOS the old fashioned way from this point on. At least newer BIOSes allow you to flash from the BIOS itself using a USB key which is pretty convenient.
IE was faster in at least some of the tests , but in none above? What gives?
Firefox 3 is much, much faster at JavaScript than Firefox 2.
Aren’t you liable to burn through your processor a lot faster [when overclocking]?
These are just hunks of silicon and metal; perhaps if you kept it for ten years you might see some ill effect, but even then, I doubt it. And who keeps the same CPU for ten years?
Taking a potshot at Scott Hanselman’s box?
No, not at all. I just want to dissuade people from the mindless 42 argument in favor of actually looking at some benchmarks. There are a few edge cases where 4 cores ARE faster, even at lower clock speeds. But not very many, and I’m unconvinced that most users spend much time at all encoding audio/video or rendering 3D scenes.
What about hardcore gaming (which I do) and running Apache and MySQL in the background? What about DVD encoding while streaming music and working on source code? How about virtualization for the developer that wants to test his cross-platform application?
I/O will be the largest bottleneck in the system by far, considering most CPUs are 99% idle all the time. People like to think that they multitask enough to replicate the behavior of a server under the load of thousands of individual users, but it’s pure fantasy IMO.
That said, if you spend all day encoding media or rendering 3D scenes, then you could certainly make a strong case that quad is a better choice for you. Make sure you have two spindles, though.
Jeff should have been eating humble pie shortly after he wrote his original article, but instead he’ll lean on dated, cherry-picked benchmarks in artificial situations.
Then link me some benchmarks that prove me wrong – common apps that benefit from having 4 cores over merely 2.
[Intel’s EDAT] On unoptimized threads that really need clocks, the CPU will be able to power down one core and overclock another automatically
This sounds perfect! I wonder how it “decides” cores are needed?