The Great Filter Comes For Us All

I’m not yet able to post new conversations, so while the following doesn’t quite fit this thread it’s an expansion of this current post:

Software has some of the most profound influences on human beings of any industry. Social media algorithms impact how people vote in elections, shape our self-image, and play a role in who we relate with. Blogs allow people to socialize, apps offer recreation, and advertising collects data on human behavior. Nearly every piece of technology, person facing or not, can alter the thinking of an individual and shape the larger community. And all of it is created by coders who don’t follow any set of ethical guidelines to ensure a standard of …

In 1847 a code of ethics was established for physicians, in1953 the American Psychological Association created a code of ethics for psychologists and more recently in 2003, one was created for educators. Arguably, none of these professions has as much influence over our entire population as do coders or programmers.

“Illnesses that affect brain function — including mental health conditions, substance abuse and neurological disorders — are estimated to cost the global economy $5tn per year (roughly the size of the German economy in nominal terms today). That’s expected to rise to $16tn by 2030.”

Brain capacity is also being squeezed. “Our mental lives are more fragmented and scattered than ever before,” said Dan Nixon, an expert on the “attention economy” — which models attention as a scarce resource in high demand. “Apps, alerts and notifications are locked in a constant battle to capture and monetise our gaze.”

Data deluge is an insidious threat to our mental health. Our bandwidth is being tested, straining our capacity to process information, synthesize data, and still have time for meditative thought, responsible for creativity (problem-solving).

It is estimated the digital universe doubles in size every two years, with 2.5 quintillion bytes of data created every day. Much of that is available with a click, with people of all ages streaming data in all forms, all day long. Daily screen time across devices — such as computers, laptops, tablets, mobile phones, televisions and game consoles — increased from 9 hours in 2012 to 11 hours in 2019, with time spent on mobile phones increasing by roughly two hours, according to a global study.

This is simply the tip of the iceberg, which instead of melting before our eyes is gaining in size and speed. With quantum computing on the horizon, the world will soon be faced with even more complex choices testing our value system without any safety net. Do the people who are hired to do this work bear any of the responsibility for how it is used?

1 Like

Most likely, not. Compare this with (some) AI algorithms/programs. Those responsible for creating them have no control over those who use them for unintended purposes… or altering them for specific purposes.

Should the original coders bear responsibility for how others use or make changes to their work? Oppenheimer worked on nuclear fusion (the A-bomb), got it to work, but did feel remorse after seeing the destruction of two cities. Still, he took responsibility. I’m sure if, given time, he could have worked on using nuclear fission for the power plants we have today, he would have rejoiced.

DNA editing is another area where the scientists decode & alter DNA with good intentions. Should they bare responsibility for, say a government, to use it to develop a virus to target people with a certain genetic code?

In a nut shell, the original coders who had noble intentions should not be responsible for any nefarious use of their work. BUT, those who do work with it with the intended bad purpose should definitely bear all the responsibility… and will take that with them to their graves.

Oh, and being retired, I usually spend about 16 hours a day on my laptop. I don’t watch TV, gave up my cellphone when I retired 27 years ago (I love not being hounded with phone calls when I’m out), and stopped playing with game consoles when my grandson turned 15. (He turned his attention to girls. :scream: :laughing: )

With the increase in the amount of data being produced now, hopefully we’ll see the new petabit-scale data disks on the market so long as an OS can recognize that size without gagging. Talk about mental data deluge.

2 Likes

I’m sorry my reply was so brief when you clearly took time and thought to respond. So now that I’m a bit freer this am, I’d like to offer a more involved response. Firstly, that’s unfortunate about your grandson- I hope evolves his relationship with you where he comes to you for advice when he makes the inevitable mistakes, we all do with women :).

Regarding your response, I resonate with the analogies with other fields such as genetics and nuclear research, however, if those who employ the workers have nefarious intentions or simply capitalistic ideals, where will the checks and balances come from? If coders are simply work for hire, without a set of guidelines that help them consider the broader implications of their work, are we left with the consumer being the only monitor?

In your other examples, there are/were certainly high stakes involved, but nothing nearly as influential on our aggregate value system as software development. Where are we going to level set with values so that we don’t continue to polarize our society over which values are most important, while clever moguls benefit from our distraction?

We don’t teach values/ethics in schools, we don’t see companies with mission/vision statements created by their workforce, and we can’t rely on the average person to be well-informed to understand the inherent dangers in tech dependence. Like all inventions, including morphine which was life changing during the civil war, our indulgent tendencies well surpass moderation.

I appreciate your conversation as I know there are no clear answers to this. I’m simply fascinated with the field of programming and software development, so I’m learning as I listen.

2 Likes

‘Conceit’ is an insightful way of describing our preoccupation with et. I do suspect we would be an entertaining civilization to study.

Great trivia about the space shuttle. What an endearing story about innovation.

2 Likes

2 posts were split to a new topic: Why are all discussions on this blog closed?