Russ Walter replied via email to this post and gave me permission to paste his response in as a comment:
I looked at your blog and have 3 comments. I’ll start with the briefest.
#1
You mentioned the 18th edition, but your photo shows the 14th edition.
#2
So to prove I’m a coder I should get a Windows tatoo? Wouldn’t a Linux Penguin tatoo be cooler? How about a Python? Or a Python with a Ruby in its mouth? Or a Big Mac whose hamburger patty is replaced with a 24-inch Mac LCD screen covered with Unix commands? Or how about “Windows is for GUI WIMPs”?
You know better than I do: tell me what’s cool to tatoo.
Several decades ago, one of my students gave me a T-shirt saying “Byte my ASCII”; I used to run through Boston while women would come up to me and ask, “Bite my what? And why is ‘bite’ spelled wrong?” We computer folks had a lot of explaining to do, back then.
#3
Several people posted comments that “The Secret Guide to Computers” hasn’t quite kept up to date, and that some of its info seems unbalanced, and that I never seemed to really adapt to the Internet age. Actually, I’ve never really adapted to ANYTHING.
Back in the early 1960’s, when I was in high school, my dad said he heard computers would be a good field to get into. I told him I had no interest in machines: I was interested just in pure math, not in things that involved being a mechanic.
Years later, when I capitulated to computers, my tastes still stayed several years behind the hoopla. Even today, I prefer GWBasic over QBasic, prefer QBasic over Visual Basic, prefer all Basics over Java C, prefer floppy backup over CD backup, and prefer Dos over Windows.
I miss the old era, when programming was an intellectual activity (“How can your whole life and personality be simulated by a set of if-then statements?”) instead of engineering drudgework (“What subroutine does Microsoft want us to invoke to handle this crap?”). I dislike that we’re living in the era of baroque interfaces (where Microsoft hides doohickeys in tiny indecipherable icons and right-clicks) instead of the old easy-to-understand menus. We’re living in the era of spastic interfaces, where the user is supposed to keep jiggling his hand until he discovers, by chance, whether the solution is to single-click, double-click, triple-click, right-click, middle-click, Ctrl-click, Shift-click, Alt-click, or give up clicking and use keyboard and spastically try the F keys, Esc key, Enter key, arrow keys, edit keys, and letters. We’re living in an age where ridiculous interfaces are tweaked by focus groups instead of being redesigned by brilliant philosophy.
We’re living in an age where “using the computer” means just “writing and passing notes on the Internet,” and where the computer has become a tool for communicating, not for thinking. We’re living in an age where a CD is so cheap to manufacture – and a Website is so cheap to post – that companies no longer supply intelligible printed manuals, making the publishing industry go down the tubes and bathroom reading difficult unless your laptop is on your toilet. We’re living in an age where any thoughtful idea will be rejected because it’s not standard, not familiar. We’re living in an age where “prestigious college-level languages,” such as C++, use braces, semicolons, and all the other nonsense that English teachers warn are the signs of obtuse writing. We’re living in an age where movies are just exercises in generating computer graphics, not generating ideas.
So yeah, I’m old-fashioned. And yeah, the 30th edition of “The Secret Guide to Computers” and the 2nd edition of “Tricky Living” will be updated to be tuned to this modern world. But do I have to pretend I like that?
#4
PapaBoojum said that when he called me in the 1980’s there was a vacuum cleaner noise, and he wondered whether that was my wife. I’ve always done my own vacuuming, and I didn’t marry a human until 1998, so the sound must have been from something else nearby. Maybe a dying hard drive? Or folks down the hall?
Also, he said he had “IIRC the fourth edition.” Sorry, I don’t know what “IIRC” is, and I know he doesn’t have the 4th edition of The Secret Guide to Computers. Maybe he has volume 4 of some later edition.
#5
You said I offer a CD-ROM with unabridged text of the book. That sentence is a bit misleading. The CD-ROM contains about 95% of the material, but it omits some photos, charts, and symbols because they were never digitized. (The book was printed on a press that used non-digital methods.)
#6
We let everybody copy everything we do, free, just by following the “free reprint” procedure on page 9, which requires that the reprint tell the reader how to get the original and that the reprint’s publisher tell us about the reprint and get our permission (which is granted as long as the reprint doesn’t mislead people). Many people followed “free reprint” procedure correctly, but some people did not. Most reprints on the Internet were created many years ago: they’re of the 28th edition (or earlier), which are all outdated, but those posts never die. They get high page ranks because they marketed themselves heavily and included more chapters than our own site; but they’re inaccurate for today’s world, they’re still missing the non-digitized parts of the book, and their HTML doesn’t duplicate the nicer layout that’s in the printed book.
May I post your comments so everyone can benefit from them?
Yes, you can put any of my comments onto your blog. You can copy my comments yourself or I can copy-and-paste them for you into your comment box.
I was tempted to post them as comments, but I thought I’d show them to you personally first, since my comments are a bit lengthy and I didn’t want to dominate your blog with too many comments about myself, especially since my comments make me seem like a Luddite, or, more specifically, an anti-progressive old fart (even though I’m a Democrat). You had already received complaints from other posters about how there were too many comments about me and not enough about yourself.
For example, do YOU do your own vacuuming, or do you have a wife or a Roomba? Here’s an advantage of modern technology: a Roomba is cheaper than a wife, and it vacuums equally poorly. That’s why I do my own vacuuming, besides trying to be nice.
Perhaps in the future a physicist could help us vacuum, by punching a black hole into the middle of the room and letting it suck everything in