From the dawn of the web – at least since Netscape Navigator 4.x – it has been possible to resize the text on a web page. This is typically done through the View menu.
Full page zoom really is a great feature, but with the ubiquity of smartphones and netbooks, it will likely be more useful for a browser to be able to cram a large page into a small space.
Opera does this really nicely with it’s Fit to Width and Small Screen modes, which work especially well in situations where iPhone-style pan zoom isn’t possible.
I’d really like to see more websites and browsers be able to adapt to the new, cramped-for-space web.
The reason text zoom doesn’t work is because the silly web-designers built a design that only works with certain text sizes. That’s great for IE and Firefox and Chrome and Safari on a 1080 screen and up, but when I’m trying to read a webpage on my digital clock it’s a real mess.
By the way, typo alert. It should be Ctl-- to reduce the size.
I like the fact I can do this with my scroll wheel (ctrl). My favorite part though is that when I do this in IE, even the scrollbar grows. Zoom in a few times and its like super mario-scale.
@Damien the majority of all keyboard either have Ctrl or Control, very few say Ctl. Heck, if you want to be really correct, Ctl and Ctrl are both not words. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ctrl
oh, I take my previous comment back about IE scrollbar resizing. That was the behavior of a particular site (where the div had the scroll) and not the browser’s window scrollbar.
One of the guys I’ve picked up all my web coding habits from has been singing the praises of full page zoom for some time. Nonetheless, it’s still good practice to support a +/- 1 font size in layouts for those who’d like to keep the images unblemished, but make the type a bit easier on the eyes.
Or web designers could follow Jeff’s lead, and fuck up their text rendering completely. In Safari 3.2.1 your bold text has occasional negative kerning. In NetNewsWire using that same Webkit version (5525.27.1), the text doesn’t render at all!
I personally love text-scaling, and hate full-page zoom on the desktop. I don’t zoom so I can use my computer from far away, I do so because the text is unreadable from a normal position.
Webkit is capable of extremely high-quality full-page scaling — it’s used on the iPhone, the Pr#275;, and Android.
Jeff, how the fuck did you manage to make a comment submission system that can’t handle unicode at all?
I used LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH MACRON to correctly accent the name of Palm’s recently announced device, and it was mangled into it’s code-point in decimal.
I like text-resizing much more than full resizing.
Text resizing allows me to increase the size of what matters – text content.
The rest – graphical fluff – takes relatively less space, which is good.
Another problem with full resizing is that browser is getting too wide and extends outside of my monitor.
Hopefully this problem will go away when I buy 22 monitor.
He’s not picking on the CTL vs CTRL…he’s noting that both Small and larger are using the same plus sign instead of a minus (or dash) for smaller.
When I blow up a webpage’s text, I want it to still fit on the screen…which the zoom described doesn’t necessarily do. All this is because some developer built a page that only works with text at some fixed number of pixels instead of a flexible, flowing design.